Magic WaterTM as ultimative fuel saver
The Magic WaterTM petrol saver utilise an unque hyper-ionizing technology to improve the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. They can be easily apply in minutes without any changes or modifications to the fuel pipe or engine.
The construction of Magic WaterTM fuel savers is based on the most up-to-date information on the ionising the car battery’ electrolite by hyperionised water and detailed tests are regularly conducted in co-operation with some F1 developement’s teams. Only latets knowlage about the energy flow physic and the most efficient and user-friendly design and packaging have been chosen for developing of these energy saving product.
WHY SHOULD YOU BUY ONE ?
- up to 20% savings on fuel consumption (guaranteed).
- 15% - 30% reduction in CARBON emissions.
- 25% - 35% reduction in HC emissions.
- Reduced engine vibrations and improved performance.
- Rapid return on investment.
- No alternations to the engine or the fuel line.
- Simple one time installation.
- Environmentally friendly.
APPLICATION
-
This product is suitable for any type of Car, Van, Boat, Bus or Generator.
-
It is equally effective for unleaded, leaded, diesel and LPG fuel.
| Test Results |
|
|
Tests have been carried out in laboratories in accordance to the rules and regulations valid in the countries of the European Community, based on the DIN/ISO norms as used in the testing facilities.
Several tests have been conducted on specialised independent test benches. Tests were conducted on a wide spectrum of older and newer cars.
The values before and after are to be understood as before and after mounting the MagicWaterTM petrol saver.
| Test 1 |
Mercedes |
| Make / Model: |
C 180 Classic |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
67,253 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
68,461 |
| Miles covered during test: |
1208 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.68 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.8 |
| After: |
14.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 32% |
| Test 2 |
AUDI |
| Make / Model: |
A4, 2TDi |
| Month / Year |
2002 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
23,320 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
23,765 |
| Miles covered during test: |
445 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.49 |
| After: |
0.40 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.3 |
| After: |
15.7 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18.2% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 17% |
| Test 3 |
BMW |
| Make / Model: |
318i |
| Month / Year |
1995 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
89,189 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
91,124 |
| Miles covered during test: |
1935 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.78 |
| After: |
0.60 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.9 |
| After: |
14.3 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 19.7% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 22% |
| Test 4 |
CITROEN |
| Make / Model: |
Xantia 1.9LX |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
48,576 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
49,317 |
| Miles covered during test: |
741 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.63 |
| After: |
0.54 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.8 |
| After: |
14.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.5% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 14% |
| Test 5 |
FORD |
| Make / Model: |
Escort 1.8 GTi |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
59,393 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
59,861 |
| Miles covered during test: |
468 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.71 |
| After: |
0.56 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
16.0 |
| After: |
13.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 14.8% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 20% |
| Test 6 |
HYUNDAI |
| Make / Model: |
Lantra 1.6 GLX |
| Month / Year |
1994 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
104,756 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
105,277 |
| Miles covered during test: |
521 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.62 |
| After: |
0.48 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
15.0 |
| After: |
12.6 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 15.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 21% |
| Test 7 |
LAND ROVER |
| Make / Model: |
Discovery 2.5 TDi |
| Month / Year |
1999 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
57,468 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
58,451 |
| Miles covered during test: |
983 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.67 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
26.6 |
| After: |
22.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 13.7% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 31% |
| Test 8 |
HONDA |
| Make / Model: |
Accord 2.0 V-Tec |
| Month / Year |
2001 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
54,182 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
54,991 |
| Miles covered during test: |
809 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.58 |
| After: |
0.44 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.0 |
| After: |
14.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 21.6% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 23% |
| Test 9 |
MAZDA |
| Make / Model: |
MX5 1.8Si |
| Month / Year |
2000 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
114,123 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
114,876 |
| Miles covered during test: |
753 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.62 |
| After: |
0.50 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
18.7 |
| After: |
15.4 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 17.3% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 19% |
| Test 10 |
NISSAN |
| Make / Model: |
Primera 2.0 LX |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
93,384 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
94,327 |
| Miles covered during test: |
943 |
| Terrain used: |
City |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.77 |
| After: |
0.50 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
19.1 |
| After: |
15.9 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 16.5% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 34% |
| Test 11 |
VOLVO |
| Make / Model: |
S40 1.8 |
| Month / Year |
1998 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
82,764 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
83,685 |
| Miles covered during test: |
921 |
| Terrain used: |
High-way |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.66 |
| After: |
0.46 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
21.0 |
| After: |
17.2 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 29% |
| Test 12 |
TOYOTA |
| Make / Model: |
Avensis 1.8 GS |
| Month / Year |
1999 |
| Mileage (miles) Before: |
68,495 |
| Mileage (miles) After: |
68,818 |
| Miles covered during test: |
323 |
| Terrain used: |
Mixed |
|
CO % Volume
|
| Before: |
0.44 |
| After: |
0.33 |
|
Fuel Consumption in litres per 100 miles
|
| Before: |
17.3 |
| After: |
14.2 |
| |
|
Fuel consumption test-result:
|
| Fuel Consumption reduced up to 18% |
| CO— content in exhaust reduced up to 23% |
|
© 2008 - 2009 The World’s 1st Fuel Saving Company
|
